Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	8.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-E7AUM-DS2H (all builds)
Memory	3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090826
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 14 '22 at 08:02
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	96%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161 34,093 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	46.7% Average	Memory 68.6 1-Core 41.6 2-Core 82.2 42% 64.1 Pts	4-Core 145 8-Core 150 20% 148 Pts	64-Core 155 10% 155 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 25,436 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Gigabyte(1458 3500) 1GB CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	8.03% Terrible	Lighting 9.4 Reflection 12.7 Parallax 2.6 8% 8.23 fps	MRender 13.1 Gravity 10.4 Splatting 9.3 9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.03% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 143 159 163 173 178 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.8% Average	Read 220 Write 180 Mixed 155 SusWrite 158 40% 178 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 33 4K Mixed 20.1 75% 24.7 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 54 DQ Mixed 87.4 67% 94.3 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 75%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB 3,373 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 45GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.4 4.1 4.4 4.1 4.5 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.92% Terrible	Read 4.5 Write 4 Mixed 4.8 SusWrite 4.3 6% 4.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 1.92% Great: 48%
WD My Book 1144 4TB 168 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 68GB free, PID 1144 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 19 21 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 17.4 Write 18.5 Mixed 18 SusWrite 19.5 25% 18.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.6% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 5.6 MC Mixed 4.4 14% 4.97 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 5.3 15% 5.27 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	34x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	4x
Core2 Duo E8600Intel $180Bench 44%, 6,109 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	34x
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples	2x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	2x

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $100

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16