Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4S  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '22 at 20:28
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3600 How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 81.6
1-Core 148
2-Core 277
92% 169 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 857
83% 682 Pts
64-Core 1,122
70% 1,122 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3560 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 157
Parallax 158
135% 160 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 136
Splatting 121
119% 150 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 124%
Great: 123%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3512G 512GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6107000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 390 402 411 287 336 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 453
Mixed 376
SusWrite 377
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 91.6
4K Mixed 50.2
171% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 201
152% 205 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 106%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
MC Read 35
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 33.5
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 32.6
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4S Builds (Compare 355 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $740
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback