Sintrones AMB-5200G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive91.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSintrones AMB-5200G  (all builds)
MotherboardSINTRONES AMB-5200G
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190305
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '22 at 16:10
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 148
60% 100 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 488
48% 390 Pts
64-Core 614
38% 614 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1191
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.26% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 68
Parallax 9.1
5% 27.7 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 14.7
9% 10.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.26%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SQF-S25M8-256G-SAC 256GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM02A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 362 370 365 371 368 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 374
Mixed 304
SusWrite 357
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 62
4K Mixed 32.2
116% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 162
171% 280 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS2GSH64V4B 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
44% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 13
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 14.6
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AMB-5200G Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Sintrones AMB-5200G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback