Performance Results

Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop 74%
Workstation 23%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C67
MotherboardMSI MAG B365M MORTAR(MS-7C67)  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200107
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '22 at 15:34
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$130
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 116
2-Core 98.8
65% 98.9 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 357
43% 331 Pts
64-Core 261
16% 261 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.4% Average
Lighting 54.6
Reflection 55.4
Parallax 47.5
44% 52.5 fps
MRender 41.3
Gravity 52.8
Splatting 45.7
38% 46.6 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 121 56 56 58 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 1107
Write 817
Mixed 634
SusWrite 110
148% 667 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 88.3
4K Mixed 55.3
176% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 706
DQ Mixed 217
251% 418 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 129%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3000 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
29.8% Poor
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 8.7
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 9
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B365M MORTAR(MS-7C67) Builds (Compare 3,232 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI MAG B365M MORTAR(MS-7C67)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $383
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback