Asus A88XM-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus A88XM-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160304
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '22 at 02:29
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$175
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 67.4
1-Core 67.2
2-Core 109
50% 81.2 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 186
25% 187 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 85CB) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
4.08% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 11.4
4% 7.13 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 9.9
Splatting 6.1
5% 6.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.08%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
792GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1281 841 806 806 825 828 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 1,520
Write 1,721
Mixed 1,351
SusWrite 898
309% 1,372 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 48
178% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 416
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 353
260% 345 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 185%
Great: 276%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB
855GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 102 115 114 118 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 130
Write 119
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 113
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR3 1600 DDR3 1600 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
28.6% Poor
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 9.6
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 9.9
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88XM-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback