Acer Aspire C24-960

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire C24-960  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire C24-960
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '22 at 17:35
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 88
1-Core 107
2-Core 196
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 391
45% 352 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 72%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1363) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1191
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.08% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 7
5% 6.8 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 11.7
8% 8.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.08%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 64 69 68 73 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 62.1
Write 68
Mixed 50
SusWrite 67.1
46% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.7
170% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFRA266.C8FD1 Kingston ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 24
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 36.1
SC Mixed 19.6
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire C24-960 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire C24-960

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback