Acer Aspire C24-960

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAcer Aspire C24-960  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire C24-960
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '21 at 19:42
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 86.7
1-Core 119
2-Core 213
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 448
52% 406 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 76%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1363) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.41% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 7.7
5% 7.47 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.1
2% 3.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.41%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
518GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 24 78 87 88 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 79.3
Write 93
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 71.2
55% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.4
162% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFRA266.C8FD1 Kingston ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 24.5
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 25.6
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire C24-960 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire C24-960

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback