Aquarius Pro, Std, Elt Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAquarius Pro, Std, Elt Series  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte GA-78LMT-S2P
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '22 at 12:08
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6100-$68
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 79.1
1-Core 33.3
2-Core 98.5
45% 70.3 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 206
24% 187 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7750
MSI(1462 2794) 2GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
8.15% Terrible
Lighting 10.9
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 13.7
9% 12.3 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 8.7
7% 8.13 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.15%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU750 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: XA003R17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 153 158 165 163 159 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.2% Below average
Read 126
Write 164
Mixed 142
SusWrite 160
34% 148 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 20
63% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 26.1
DQ Write 44.1
DQ Mixed 31.7
25% 34 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 106%
Toshiba MK5059GSXP 500GB-$50
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GT001H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 31 11 14 37 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 20.1
Write 22
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 28.5
16% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
59% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14%
Great: 44%
Beeline Tab 2 2GB
1GB free, PID 0001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.1 4.5 4.3 4.3 3.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.42% Terrible
Read 8.7
Write 6
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 4.1
11% 8.38 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
90% 1.03 MB/s
Beeline Tab 2 32GB
6GB free, PID 0001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 4.2 4.5 4.2 4.2 3.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.8% Very poor
Read 0.7
Write 22.6
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 5
16% 9.75 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.1
133% 1.6 MB/s
WDC WD75 01AALS-75J7B0 750GB
277GB free, PID 201d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 7.4 7.3 6.1 9.2 10 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.27% Terrible
Read 7.5
Write 7
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 8.5
11% 7.68 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
11% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.27%
Great: 13%
WD My Passport 0742 750GB
133GB free, PID 0742
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
8.88% Terrible
Read 16.7
Write 15
Mixed 14.4
SusWrite 15.1
21% 15.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 8.88%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
41.1% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 15.2
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 10.1
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro, Std, Elt Series Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Aquarius Pro, Std, Elt Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $454
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback