Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2100-$49 63,701 User benchmarks, average bench 51% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	54.8% Above average	Memory 83.6 1-Core 67.7 2-Core 121 57% 90.8 Pts	4-Core 151 8-Core 168 21% 159 Pts	64-Core 179 11% 179 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 8094) 2GB CLim: 600 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.21% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 4.2 Parallax 6.7 0% 3.7 fps	MRender 3.6 Gravity 5.2 Splatting 3.3 3% 4.03 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 1.21% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$52 23,658 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 139GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61190WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 185 192 187 189 199 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.9% Above average	Read 233 Write 215 Mixed 151 SusWrite 190 44% 197 MB/s	4K Read 10.9 4K Write 33.8 4K Mixed 28.9 72% 24.5 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 177 137% 188 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 105%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 397GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 114 116 116 116 116 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	67.8% Good	Read 121 Write 110 Mixed 72.2 SusWrite 115 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 206% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM1333KLN-4G Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 8GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.2% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 15.1 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 8.7 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	447x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	149x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	112x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $227