Default AORUS 17G YD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGIGABYTE AORUS 17G YD
MotherboardDefault AORUS 17G YD  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '22 at 03:38
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 84.4
1-Core 164
2-Core 325
102% 191 Pts
4-Core 642
8-Core 1,099
106% 870 Pts
64-Core 1,515
94% 1,515 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 102%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 (Laptop)
Gigabyte(1458 78CB) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7239
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 183
Parallax 162
135% 170 fps
MRender 169
Gravity 129
Splatting 120
112% 140 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 122%
Great: 144%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ESR512GMFCM-E8GBTNB4 512GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFM21.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,132
Write 2,726
Mixed 2,068
518% 2,308 MB/s
4K Read 71.4
4K Write 318
4K Mixed 108
414% 166 MB/s
DQ Read 756
DQ Write 1,171
DQ Mixed 1,064
777% 997 MB/s
Poor: 166% Great: 338%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
465GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2255 618 613 614 613 613 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 2,514
Write 2,322
Mixed 1,624
SusWrite 888
410% 1,837 MB/s
4K Read 68.5
4K Write 197
4K Mixed 99
335% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1,650
DQ Write 1,310
DQ Mixed 1,380
1,060% 1,447 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 324%
Great: 340%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 34.6
108% 38 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 38.4
SC Mixed 21.2
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AORUS 17G YD Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO

Motherboard: Default AORUS 17G YD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback