HP t530 Thin Client

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP t530 Thin Client  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8267
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170609
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '22 at 00:55
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Embedded G-Series GX-215JJ Radeon R2E
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Memory 54.8
1-Core 35.2
2-Core 54.1
32% 48 Pts
4-Core 54.2
8-Core 50.5
7% 52.3 Pts
64-Core 45.3
3% 45.3 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2E Graphics
HP(103C 8267) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.43% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 0.2
Parallax 2.2
1% 1.27 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 3.6
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.43%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UI500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 2.9 3 42 80 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 362
Write 224
Mixed 172
SusWrite 57.8
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 23
4K Mixed 10.3
44% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 72.9
DQ Mixed 39.9
43% 73.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.5% Poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 7.1
20% 6.87 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical t530 Thin Client Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP t530 Thin Client

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback