HP t530 Thin Client

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP t530 Thin Client  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8267
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190307
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 27 '22 at 12:58
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Embedded G-Series GX-215JJ Radeon R2E
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Memory 60.7
1-Core 37.5
2-Core 59
35% 52.4 Pts
4-Core 56.2
8-Core 55.9
8% 56.1 Pts
64-Core 53.9
3% 53.9 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2E Graphics
HP(103C 8267) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.71% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 2.4
1% 2.53 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 4.3
2% 2.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.71%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
32gb SATA Flash Drive 32GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SFDN0A4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 33 37 39 38 39 MB/s
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.1% Average
Read 212
Write 39.4
Mixed 65.1
SusWrite 37.1
19% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 21
4K Mixed 23.9
86% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 98.1
DQ Write 32.8
DQ Mixed 48.1
40% 59.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.5% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.57 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.5
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical t530 Thin Client Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP t530 Thin Client

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback