HP h9-1110t

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP h9-1110t (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON 2AB5
Memory	8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111012
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 11 '22 at 01:48
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	54%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$187 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	68.4% Good	Memory 89.1 1-Core 88 2-Core 162 68% 113 Pts	4-Core 259 8-Core 382 40% 321 Pts	64-Core 375 23% 375 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362 42,960 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 2843) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	28% Poor	Lighting 32.9 Reflection 30.3 Parallax 43.7 27% 35.6 fps	MRender 38.8 Gravity 41.6 Splatting 32.4 30% 37.6 fps
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 120 120 116 116 121 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.6% Below average	Read 221 Write 164 Mixed 150 SusWrite 120 37% 164 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 24.3 4K Mixed 11.3 39% 14.4 MB/s	DQ Read 300 DQ Write 167 DQ Mixed 211 163% 226 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 134%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB-$112 12,285 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 609GB free Firmware: JP4OA41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 117 110 117 122 114 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Read 119 Write 115 Mixed 55.7 SusWrite 117 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 76%
WD WD25EZRS-00J99B0 2.5TB 850 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 73 63 63 62 73 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	48% Average	Read 100 Write 81.9 Mixed 51.9 SusWrite 66.5 55% 75.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 68%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB 8,402 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2TB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 61 55 54 53 59 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 108 Write 86 Mixed 56.7 SusWrite 56.1 98% 76.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.4 143% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 61%
WD Elements 2620 5TB 4,390 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2.5TB free, PID 2620 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 66 58 57 57 64 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	35.1% Below average	Read 67.9 Write 68 Mixed 41.4 SusWrite 60.3 80% 59.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.7 159% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 65%
General UDisk 134GB 509 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 112GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 4.8 12 11 11 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	5.29% Terrible	Read 18.7 Write 7.5 Mixed 18.2 SusWrite 8.8 17% 13.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.29% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16JTF51264AZ-1G4A1 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 16JTF51264AZ-1G4A1 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.7% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 14.7 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 14.8 42% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 68.3 59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical h9-1110t Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: HP h9-1110t

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	1x
GTX 660-TiNvidia $362Bench 26%, 42,960 samples	1x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	1x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	1x

RAM
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8C-PB Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 24GBUnknownBench 50%, 3 samples	1x
EBJ41UF8BCF0-DJ-F Corsair CML8GX3M2A1600C9 EBJ41UF8BCF0-DJ-F Corsair CML8GX3M2A1600C9 16GBElpidaBench 49%, 2 samples	1x
8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 12GBMicronBench 49%, 8 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $388

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16