Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J1800 5,848 User benchmarks, average bench 30% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	Memory 57.9 1-Core 22.3 2-Core 39.5 29% 39.9 Pts	4-Core 43 8-Core 44.2 6% 43.6 Pts	64-Core 44.3 3% 44.3 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2B0C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3408 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.74% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 0.5 1% 0.73 fps	MRender 1.6 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1.1 1% 1.13 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.74% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 375GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP74 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 86 93 89 61 43 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	27.6% Poor	Read 22.6 Write 43.7 Mixed 28.9 SusWrite 73.6 31% 42.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 85% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 1x2GB 3,854 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.5 MC Write 4.7 MC Mixed 5.3 14% 4.83 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 4.3 10% 3.53 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J1800IntelBench 30%, 5,848 samples	6x
Pentium J2900IntelBench 35%, 4,259 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	7x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 128GBMicronBench 56%, 11,312 samples	1x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $53Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	1x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	1x
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 19,285 samples	1x
HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 1x2GBHynixBench 18%, 3,854 samples	1x