PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 82.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H67-V (all builds) |
Memory | 13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1680x1050x4294967296 szín |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130712 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 10 '22 at 08:15 |
Run Duration | 248 Seconds |
Run User | HUN-User |
Background CPU | 54% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3570
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
79.5%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Gainward(10B0 0801) 1GB
CLim: 835 MHz, MLim: 1025 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
16.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 134 131 127 127 126 MB/s
|
82.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Intenso Sata III 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: S0813A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 234 232 234 234 236 MB/s
|
54.1%
Above average
|
|||
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35
104GB free
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 170 138 134 128 135 MB/s
|
36.2%
Below average
|
|||
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30
87GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 227 97 65 66 66 MB/s
|
56.5%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 65x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 58x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 46x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 29x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 24x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 17x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 23x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 16x |
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $333 |