MSI MS-16V4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive337% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GS66 Stealth 11UH
MotherboardMSI MS-16V4  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '22 at 02:06
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 65.1
1-Core 139
2-Core 324
90% 176 Pts
4-Core 540
8-Core 698
79% 619 Pts
64-Core 832
52% 832 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12F5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9415
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
7.39% Terrible
Lighting 9.7
Reflection 63.9
Parallax 11.8
8% 28.5 fps
MRender 15.1
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 0.2
6% 8.97 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.39%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162 1TB
868GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1847 2094 2195 2230 2287 2285 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
337% Outstanding
Read 2015
Write 1,795
Mixed 1,865
SusWrite 2,156
442% 1,958 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 233
4K Mixed 75.4
294% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,017
DQ Write 546
DQ Mixed 742
562% 768 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 337%
Great: 386%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 31.5
105% 36.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 39.8
SC Mixed 17.7
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16V4 Builds (Compare 1,377 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-16V4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback