TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Huananzhi A_M_I_

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHuananzhi A_M_I_  (all builds)
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-8M-F
Memory21.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20201015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '22 at 00:57
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 81.8
2-Core 170
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 495
49% 400 Pts
64-Core 600
37% 600 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 71.9%
 Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 16.9
Reflection 28.4
Parallax 22.2
14% 22.5 fps
MRender 27
Gravity 16.4
Splatting 22.4
18% 21.9 fps
Poor: 12% ↑
This bench: 15.2%
 Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful SL300 1 120GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 370 371 373 382 380 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 439
Write 362
Mixed 337
SusWrite 375
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 80.1
4K Mixed 19.7
112% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 32
59% 114 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 80.3%
 Great: 66%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
132GB free
Firmware: 0-19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 67 66 68 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 47.9
Write 52.7
Mixed 33.6
SusWrite 67.1
37% 50.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 33%
 Great: 42%
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB
14GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 5.3 5.5 5.6 5.6 5.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
3.85% Terrible
Read 16
Write 5.5
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 5.2
9% 7.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 3.85%
 Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown atermiter atermiter 24GB
2667, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.8% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 10.7
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 11.4
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 36% ↑
This bench: 35.8%
 Great: 93%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical A_M_I_ Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Huananzhi A_M_I_

CPU
Xeon E5-2666 v3IntelBench 73%, 1,745 samples6x
Xeon E5-2670 v3IntelBench 66%, 3,953 samples4x
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples4x
GPU
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples4x
GTX 550-TiNvidia  $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples3x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples2x
SSD
SSDSC2KW51 512GBIntelBench 88%, 50 samples4x
512GB 512GBSSDBench 87%, 6,819 samples2x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples2x
RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples5x
M393B2G70EB0-YK0 2x16GBSamsungBench 52%, 13 samples3x
HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 60%, 912 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback