Huananzhi X79-ZD3 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardHuananzhi X79-ZD3 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory21.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '22 at 13:56
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 60.2
2-Core 159
59% 100 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 480
49% 394 Pts
64-Core 597
37% 597 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.3
1% 0.3 fps
Poor: 35% Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX6000LNP 256GB
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 843 786 580 206 21 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 1,255
Write 845
Mixed 318
SusWrite 409
156% 707 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 42.2
146% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 275
202% 258 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 132%
Great: 228%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
235GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 145 155 152 155 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 125
Write 99.6
Mixed 74.4
SusWrite 152
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- Dimm2_Manufacturer M393B5170GB0- Dimm4_Manufacturer M393B5170GB0- M393B1K70DH0- 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.2% Very good
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 30
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11.2
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79-ZD3 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79-ZD3 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback