TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Huananzhi X79-ZD3 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardHuananzhi X79-ZD3 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory21.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '22 at 13:50
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 69
2-Core 134
58% 94.2 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 470
47% 380 Pts
64-Core 595
37% 595 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑
This bench: 67%
 Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
AMD(1002 0B37)
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.9% Average
Lighting 52.5
Reflection 62.7
Parallax 81.4
43% 65.5 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 63.3
Splatting 44.9
46% 58 fps
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 43.9%
 Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX6000LNP 256GB
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 865 853 470 18 8.5 7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 1,288
Write 831
Mixed 335
SusWrite 370
156% 706 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 41.3
143% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 267
200% 260 MB/s
Poor: 105% ↑
This bench: 130%
 Great: 228%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
235GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 111 111 111 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 128
Write 109
Mixed 73
SusWrite 110
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 68.6%
 Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- Dimm2_Manufacturer M393B5170GB0- Dimm4_Manufacturer M393B5170GB0- M393B1K70DH0- 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.7% Very good
MC Read 32
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 29.2
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11.2
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 75.7%
 Great: 96%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical X79-ZD3 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79-ZD3 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples14x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples10x
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel  $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples6x
GPU
RX 570AMD  $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples5x
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples4x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia  $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples4x
SSD
SX6000LNP 256GBAdataBench 168%, 9,539 samples5x
NE-256 256GBBench 159%, 6,044 samples4x
Ultra Plus 128GBSanDisk  $75Bench 77%, 16,709 samples2x
RAM
M393B1K70DH0- Dimm2_Manufacturer M393B5170GB0- Dimm4_Manufacturer M393B5170GB0- M393B1K70DH0- 24GBSamsungBench 82%, 9 samples5x
M393B5170FH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 676 samples4x
M393B2G70DB0- 2x16GBSamsungBench 57%, 461 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback