Dell OptiPlex 990

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.91% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell OptiPlex 990
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 990  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '22 at 03:39
Run Duration352 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 84.9
2-Core 167
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 219
38% 266 Pts
64-Core 229
14% 229 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
PNY(196E 089C) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
8.91% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 10.7
8% 11.9 fps
MRender 15.6
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 10.8
10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.91%
Great: 9%
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Dell(1028 047E) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.6% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 0.7
0% 0.83 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.6%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 155 144 136 133 130 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 471
Write 232
Mixed 226
SusWrite 149
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 59.6
4K Mixed 30.6
113% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 152
125% 184 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
136GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 102 99 101 100 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 84.1
Write 58.6
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 100
54% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1GB free
Firmware: CC26
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 54.7
Write 51.2
Mixed 49.7
39% 51.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
74% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
WD easystore 25FB 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 109 106 107 105 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 152
Write 150
Mixed 99.2
SusWrite 107
168% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 71%
ST6000DM 003-2CY186 6TB
82GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 100
Write 121
Mixed 93.8
SusWrite 0.6
103% 79 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.6
181% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 67%
ST6000DM 003-2CY186 6TB
206GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 51 51 51 52 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 139
Write 156
Mixed 96.2
SusWrite 50.6
144% 110 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.6
168% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 67%
ST5000DM 000-1FK178 5TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 51 51 52 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 88.1
Write 108
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 51.3
93% 70.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 0.6
275% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 82%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
1TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 0.9 0.4 0.2 0.7 0.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 123
Write 142
Mixed 110
SusWrite 0.7
122% 94 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.7
201% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 73%
ST6000DM 003-2CY186 6TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 18 18 19 22 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 133
Write 141
Mixed 109
SusWrite 19.2
130% 100 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.8
209% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 70%
ST6000DM 003-2CY186 6TB
4TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 55 54 56 57 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 143
Write 150
Mixed 112
SusWrite 55.3
151% 115 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.7
206% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 70%
ST6000DM 003-2CY186 6TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 18 18 19 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 174
Write 165
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 19
141% 113 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
121% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 70%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
29GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 18 19 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 112
Write 115
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 18.8
109% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.6
193% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 KHX1866C10D3/4G Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 14.1
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 990 Builds (Compare 3,988 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 990

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $229
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback