Avell A62

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics47% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAvell A62  (all builds)
MotherboardAvell GJ5CN6E
Memory5.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180530
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '22 at 00:23
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU6%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 96.9
1-Core 119
2-Core 233
86% 150 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 589
65% 513 Pts
64-Core 782
48% 782 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1045) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1165
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47% Average
Lighting 56.1
Reflection 69.2
Parallax 58.5
46% 61.3 fps
MRender 65.1
Gravity 56.1
Splatting 60.2
49% 60.5 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47%
Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV8-8E512 512GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C292101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 125 332 289 292 293 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 395
Mixed 389
SusWrite 277
87% 390 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 79
4K Mixed 48.5
158% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 133
155% 268 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 101%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GKE800SO102408-2666A 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.9% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 22.1
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 23.9
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 50.9
79% 50.9 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A62 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

System: Avell A62

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback