Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130427
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '22 at 18:34
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 85.5
1-Core 93.6
2-Core 185
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 349
47% 352 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1165
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.4% Average
Lighting 54.7
Reflection 68
Parallax 67.7
45% 63.5 fps
MRender 68.1
Gravity 61.3
Splatting 56
50% 61.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 259 265 257 289 262 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 277
Write 332
Mixed 271
SusWrite 275
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 28.3
90% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 35.2
DQ Write 74.3
DQ Mixed 44.8
37% 51.4 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 124%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
669GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 136 132 135 136 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 135
Write 133
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 133
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 74%
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 500G 500GB
61GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 192 141 139 137 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 281
Write 236
Mixed 252
SusWrite 160
307% 232 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 20.7
4K Mixed 19.3
1,427% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 23.4
DQ Write 31.1
DQ Mixed 26.6
2,049% 27 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 143%
Great: 376%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-007.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 958 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $216
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback