Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '22 at 08:34
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$191
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Memory 96
1-Core 148
2-Core 291
99% 178 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 898
88% 722 Pts
64-Core 1,204
74% 1,204 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 223
Parallax 255
113% 206 fps
MRender 280
Gravity 235
Splatting 174
182% 229 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 129%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,528
Write 2,179
Mixed 1,643
470% 2,117 MB/s
4K Read 66.7
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 94
310% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,322
DQ Write 977
DQ Mixed 1109
840% 1,136 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
189GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,913
Write 6,415
Mixed 6,404
1,468% 6,577 MB/s
4K Read 786
4K Write 285
4K Mixed 414
1,873% 495 MB/s
DQ Read 1,701
DQ Write 922
DQ Mixed 1,073
862% 1,232 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 39.2
MC Mixed 25.8
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 38.9
SC Mixed 27.3
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 53.9
74% 53.9 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II Builds (Compare 646 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $538
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback