Asrock X570 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics86.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive383% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X570 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '22 at 18:47
Run Duration276 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$355
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 80.8
1-Core 163
2-Core 317
100% 187 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 895
85% 701 Pts
64-Core 2,304
143% 2,304 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.23.01
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.6% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 112
Parallax 197
90% 140 fps
MRender 93.9
Gravity 131
Splatting 77.8
81% 101 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS500G1X0E-00AFY0 500GB
393GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 611100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3061 2078 1791 1144 952 877 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
383% Outstanding
Read 3,594
Write 3,929
Mixed 2,856
SusWrite 1,651
675% 3,007 MB/s
4K Read 69.8
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 87.4
304% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,090
DQ Write 917
DQ Mixed 980
740% 996 MB/s
Poor: 234%
This bench: 383%
Great: 494%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
485GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 458 457 457 457 457 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 445
Mixed 445
SusWrite 458
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 84.5
4K Mixed 52.1
171% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 202 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 110%
Great: 133%
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
39GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 362 362 360 362 362 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 358
Mixed 332
SusWrite 361
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 37.5
129% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 160
128% 180 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 103%
Drevo X1 SSD 240GB
29GB free
Firmware: P0510D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 237 76 77 77 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 486
Write 359
Mixed 348
SusWrite 151
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 39.1
131% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 178
136% 186 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 750GB (2008)-$72
288GB free
Firmware: 30.04G30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 85 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 46
Write 48
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 84.7
40% 54.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 52%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
183GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 64 65 65 69 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 72.3
Write 45
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 65.9
44% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965745-017.A00G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 44.4
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 41.7
120% 42.1 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 38.5
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 113%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Taichi Builds (Compare 2,215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi - $213

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,560
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback