Dynabook dynabook TECRA A40-G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemDynabook dynabook TECRA A40-G  (all builds)
MotherboardDynabook A0104/0002
Memory18.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220106
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '22 at 14:03
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 73.2
1-Core 95.1
2-Core 187
67% 118 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 380
43% 339 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(3100 0018) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
3.15% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 6.4
3% 5.27 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 0.2
3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.15%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
C-E80T256G4-P3D3B3E13 256GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFD00.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 125 287 279 304 259 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 786
Write 299
Mixed 300
SusWrite 255
90% 410 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 88.3
4K Mixed 35.6
140% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 432
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 421
305% 396 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 107%
Great: 207%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA266.C8FB 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.5% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 23.2
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 23
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical dynabook TECRA A40-G Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dynabook dynabook TECRA A40-G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback