Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20071

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20071  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Guam
Memory6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '22 at 13:48
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II N870 Triple-Core
Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Memory 50.7
1-Core 33.9
2-Core 67.1
32% 50.6 Pts
4-Core 99.8
8-Core 101
13% 100 Pts
64-Core 101
6% 101 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
Legend(17AA 3949) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
0.65% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 0.7
1% 1.03 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 0.4
0% 0.63 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.65%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biostar S130-120GB 120GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BS2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 216 180 204 176 202 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 381
Write 247
Mixed 267
SusWrite 203
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 16.1
71% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 133
116% 173 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 82%
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34
33GB free
Firmware: 0011LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 38 36 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 63
Write 50.5
Mixed 36.2
SusWrite 36.9
34% 46.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
114% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
25.2% Poor
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 9.6
26% 9.07 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 6.6
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20071 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20071

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback