Lenovo 20071

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20071  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Guam
Memory6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '22 at 13:42
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II N870 Triple-Core
Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Memory 49.4
1-Core 35
2-Core 67.5
32% 50.6 Pts
4-Core 98.6
8-Core 99.3
13% 98.9 Pts
64-Core 99.6
6% 99.6 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
Legend(17AA 3949) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.49% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 0.7
0% 0.93 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 0.4
0% 0.63 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.49%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biostar S130-120GB 120GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BS2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 208 150 205 184 191 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 373
Write 216
Mixed 263
SusWrite 195
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 15.9
69% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 134
115% 169 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 82%
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34
33GB free
Firmware: 0011LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 36 37 34 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 61.7
Write 61.3
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 36.3
36% 49 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
25.2% Poor
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 9.7
26% 9.13 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 6.5
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 163
25% 163 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20071 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20071

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback