Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	33.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 406 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket-R 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Memory 63.7 1-Core 61.6 2-Core 122 49% 82.6 Pts	4-Core 232 8-Core 456 41% 344 Pts	64-Core 604 37% 604 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% PNY(196E 1033) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.8% Below average	Lighting 39 Reflection 36.3 Parallax 51.8 32% 42.4 fps	MRender 54 Gravity 48.1 Splatting 39.4 38% 47.2 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 36%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 310 310 307 310 309 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	79% Very good	Read 452 Write 411 Mixed 367 SusWrite 320 87% 388 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 43.7 4K Mixed 31.7 105% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 196 147% 196 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18KSF51272AZ-1G 8x4GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	75% Very good	MC Read 36.4 MC Write 24.8 MC Mixed 31.4 88% 30.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 5.5 18% 6.13 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 91%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 89%

Aircraft carrier

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	16x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	15x

RAM
M393B1G73QH0-YK 8x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 8 samples	7x
HMT31GR7EFR4C-R 7x8GBHynixBench 91%, 9 samples	7x
9905403-582.A00 8x8GBKingstonBench 85%, 7 samples	6x

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $351