Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	18.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450D APU 33 User benchmarks, average bench 29% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Memory 24.6 1-Core 10.8 2-Core 15.6 12% 17 Pts	4-Core 15.2 8-Core 24.2 2% 19.7 Pts	64-Core 16.2 1% 16.2 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 8,182 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Biostar(1565 1707) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	1.12% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.4 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 2 1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.12% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14 42,288 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: Y201229a SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 100 122 134 112 144 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	18.4% Very poor	Read 96.6 Write 169 Mixed 92.2 SusWrite 116 27% 118 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 12.8 4K Mixed 7 20% 7.5 MB/s	DQ Read 17.3 DQ Write 30.4 DQ Mixed 20.5 16% 22.7 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 88%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 221GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 99 114 124 113 118 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	73.5% Very good	Read 148 Write 117 Mixed 33.9 SusWrite 108 74% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 112% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 Elpida EBJ20UF8BDW0-GN-F 6GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 800, 800 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	4.3% Terrible	MC Read 1.3 MC Write 2.2 MC Mixed 0.5 4% 1.33 GB/s	SC Read 0.1 SC Write 0.9 SC Mixed 0.6 2% 0.53 GB/s	Latency 288 14% 288 ns
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.3% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
E-450D APUAMDBench 29%, 33 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6320AMDBench 1%, 8,182 samples	1x

RAM
1x2GBAdataBench 19%, 409 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16