Asrock B450M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210804
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '22 at 19:44
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 76.1
1-Core 113
2-Core 231
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 686
70% 566 Pts
64-Core 898
56% 898 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2020 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.23.01
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.3% Above average
Lighting 62.6
Reflection 65.8
Parallax 87.2
51% 71.9 fps
MRender 69.4
Gravity 69
Splatting 46.9
49% 61.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$53
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.R Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 702
Write 634
Mixed 617
145% 651 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 77.8
4K Mixed 38.5
134% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 591
DQ Write 521
DQ Mixed 509
395% 540 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 141%
Kingston SUV500M8120G 120GB
38GB free
Firmware: 003056RR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 59 84 72 70 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 479
Write 308
Mixed 296
SusWrite 84.7
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 40.8
139% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 98.1
99% 164 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-017.A00G 9905702-010.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
84.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 27.9
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 31.2
SC Mixed 25.9
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Pro4 Builds (Compare 9,036 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4 - $79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $427
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback