Asrock B450M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '21 at 13:40
Run Duration303 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 114
2-Core 230
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 689
70% 568 Pts
64-Core 910
56% 910 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 2020 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.11.3
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.4% Below average
Lighting 44.7
Reflection 57.2
Parallax 69.8
36% 57.2 fps
MRender 60.8
Gravity 47.2
Splatting 40.2
39% 49.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$53
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.R Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 676
Write 263
Mixed 313
91% 417 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 30.2
123% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 405
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 247
204% 297 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 141%
Kingston SUV500M8120G 120GB
11GB free
Firmware: 003056RR
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 485
Write 330
Mixed 318
84% 378 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 41.3
146% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 127
128% 208 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-017.A00G 9905702-010.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 27.9
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 25.9
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Pro4 Builds (Compare 9,036 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4 - $79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $427
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback