PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Lenovo 11365K5 (all builds) |
Motherboard | LENOVO LENOVO |
Memory | 27 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140313 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 06 '22 at 16:22 |
Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 15% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
58.2%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
HP(103C 1096) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.92
|
21.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-000L7 256GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 252 275 276 252 246 MB/s
|
83.1%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$20
457GB free
Firmware: 1H20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 112 112 114 116 109 MB/s
|
65%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M391B5273DH0- 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
78.2%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 v21stBench 57%, 469 samples | 7x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 01stBench 60%, 1,235 samples | 3x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples | 3x |
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 2x |
Radeon HD 5400ATIBench 1%, 10,400 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 15% - Very poor | Total price: $170 |