Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P55A-UD5  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '22 at 15:25
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 93.8
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 154
68% 110 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 408
43% 342 Pts
64-Core 407
25% 407 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 192
Parallax 184
142% 183 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 180
Splatting 128
120% 148 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 128%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 101 105 127 129 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
58% Above average
Read 341
Write 171
Mixed 208
SusWrite 122
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 27.8
96% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 161
120% 159 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 58%
Great: 85%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
65GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 140 136 78 79 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 369
Write 218
Mixed 259
SusWrite 92.7
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 51.4
4K Mixed 25.6
101% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 48.6
74% 141 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46.4% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 14.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 13.7
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 60.3
66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P55A-UD5 Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback