CMS 7200-5704A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 186%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 170%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics194% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCMS 7200-5704A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TUF GAMING B460-PLUS
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '22 at 14:58
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$235
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 147
2-Core 291
97% 177 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 837
88% 707 Pts
64-Core 1,212
75% 1,212 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
194% Outstanding
Lighting 283
Reflection 252
Parallax 285
230% 273 fps
MRender 323
Gravity 238
Splatting 175
193% 245 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 194%
Great: 202%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
900GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 53 80 113 134 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 28.6
Write 45.5
Mixed 26.3
SusWrite 82.6
34% 45.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
47% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GD3200C16K4 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 23.7
90% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 27.6
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7200-5704A Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 171%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 166%
UFO

System: CMS 7200-5704A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $934
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback