Advent Modena M201 Red

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAdvent Modena M201 Red  (all builds)
MotherboardAdvent Modena M201 Red
Memory1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100924
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '22 at 10:35
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Memory 65.1
1-Core 32.4
2-Core 62.9
36% 53.5 Pts
4-Core 58.1
8-Core 61.8
8% 59.9 Pts
64-Core 60.2
4% 60.2 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Device(1297 2000)
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.16% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.3
0% 0.37 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.16%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XD0R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 107 38 63 21 50 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.7% Poor
Read 242
Write 188
Mixed 198
SusWrite 61.2
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 9
4K Mixed 11.6
43% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 74
DQ Write 15.5
DQ Mixed 24.9
23% 38.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SSY3128M8-EDJ1D SSZ3128M8-EDJ1D 3GB
0, 0 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
13.4% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.5
11% 4 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3.2
11% 3.7 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Modena M201 Red Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Advent Modena M201 Red

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback