Advent Modena M201 Red

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive16.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAdvent Modena M201 Red  (all builds)
MotherboardAdvent Modena M201 Red
Memory0.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '22 at 02:42
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Memory 38.5
1-Core 21.7
2-Core 22.1
20% 27.4 Pts
4-Core 54.6
8-Core 49.6
7% 52.1 Pts
64-Core 44.1
3% 44.1 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Device(1297 2000)
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XD0R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 87 59 98 82 46 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
16.5% Very poor
Read 150
Write 96.9
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 75.5
21% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 2.7
21% 5.47 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SSY3128M8-EDJ1D SSZ3128M8-EDJ1D 3GB
0, 0 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
9.74% Terrible
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.5 GB/s
SC Read 1.2
SC Write 1
SC Mixed 0.5
3% 0.9 GB/s
Latency 209
19% 209 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.74%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Modena M201 Red Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Advent Modena M201 Red

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback