Gateway SX2840

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics12.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGateway SX2840  (all builds)
MotherboardGateway FIH57
Memory3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '22 at 05:56
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 550-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
44.2% Average
Memory 63.8
1-Core 67.8
2-Core 96.7
48% 76.1 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 140
19% 143 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Nvidia(10DE 1016) 1GB
CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Lighting 13.4
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 21.6
11% 17.4 fps
MRender 21
Gravity 21.1
Splatting 15.9
16% 19.3 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 72 74 77 76 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 80.8
Write 81
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 74.7
54% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
265GB free
Firmware: GG2OAF10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 43 44 44 44 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 83.2
Write 1.5
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 42.6
28% 38.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
61% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 None 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.2% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 11.3
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.5
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SX2840 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Gateway SX2840

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $45
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback