Lenovo 20369

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20369  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 4A2
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140402
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '22 at 13:10
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4030U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Memory 81.8
1-Core 49.6
2-Core 82.6
48% 71.3 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 123
16% 120 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 380C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4642
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.8% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 5.7
2% 3.67 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 2
Splatting 4.3
3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.8%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
430GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0002LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 28 20 33 45 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 87.2
Write 72.9
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 29.8
43% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
88% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 61%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
12GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 16 19 20 21 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 22.8
Write 21.6
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 17.8
22% 17.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.9
66% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 RMT3170EF68F9W1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.8% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 15.6
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 13.4
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20369 Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20369

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback