HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics61.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84DB
Memory15.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210707
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '22 at 02:00
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 61.4
2-Core 120
57% 90.4 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 450
43% 357 Pts
64-Core 598
37% 598 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
HP(103C 84DB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61.5% Good
Lighting 69.9
Reflection 104
Parallax 78.2
57% 84.1 fps
MRender 87.4
Gravity 79.7
Splatting 89.3
70% 85.5 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD70H1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,296
Write 1,520
Mixed 914
278% 1,243 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 44.5
154% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 626
DQ Write 580
DQ Mixed 568
436% 591 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 235%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
160GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 99 96 97 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 99.7
Write 105
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 97.1
62% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
105% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 24GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
73% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 21.3
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 16.4
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx Builds (Compare 3,759 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback