Gigabyte GA-970-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '22 at 21:32
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 78
1-Core 61.1
2-Core 115
53% 84.6 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 291
30% 244 Pts
64-Core 291
18% 291 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85CD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.9% Poor
Lighting 34.6
Reflection 37.1
Parallax 35.3
28% 35.7 fps
MRender 35.8
Gravity 40
Splatting 27
27% 34.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 256GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 225 65 50 76 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
47% Average
Read 474
Write 379
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 106
54% 247 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 15.1
4K Mixed 4.4
44% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 1.2
59% 141 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47%
Great: 95%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100V -63 1TB
603GB free
Firmware: AX0M1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 94 95 96 96 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 107
Write 102
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 94.3
63% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 64%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
853GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 90 90 90 89 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 91.3
Write 87.2
Mixed 49.1
SusWrite 90.2
58% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C Team--Elite-1 HMT351U6EFR8C Team--Elite-1 16GB
800, 667, 800, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.6% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 15.3
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 11.7
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 84.3
47% 84.3 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970-GAMING Builds (Compare 330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback