Gigabyte GA-970-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '22 at 20:37
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 75.3
1-Core 57.4
2-Core 108
50% 80.4 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 269
27% 220 Pts
64-Core 266
16% 266 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85CD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.8% Poor
Lighting 33.7
Reflection 35.3
Parallax 32.8
28% 33.9 fps
MRender 32.7
Gravity 38
Splatting 25
26% 31.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 256GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 150 9.2 98 45 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
33% Below average
Read 445
Write 384
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 113
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 15.1
22% 6.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 33%
Great: 95%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100V -63 1TB
603GB free
Firmware: AX0M1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 95 96 95 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 107
Write 105
Mixed 41.2
SusWrite 94.5
63% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
82% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 64%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
853GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 89 89 88 89 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
51% Above average
Read 88.3
Write 93.5
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 89.3
50% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C Team--Elite-1 HMT351U6EFR8C Team--Elite-1 16GB
800, 667, 800, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.1% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 14.8
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11.5
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970-GAMING Builds (Compare 330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback