Samsung 950XDA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive368% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung 950XDA  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NT950XDA-KC58W
Memory18.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211104
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '22 at 10:30
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 147
2-Core 276
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 441
8-Core 602
66% 522 Pts
64-Core 569
35% 569 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Sanyo(144D C852) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9415
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 21.9
Parallax 24
16% 21.9 fps
MRender 19.9
Gravity 25.8
Splatting 0.2
11% 15.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHGP31-1000GM 1TB
662GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41062C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2355 1536 1483 1432 1440 1443 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
368% Outstanding
Read 2,802
Write 2,536
Mixed 1736
SusWrite 1,615
486% 2,172 MB/s
4K Read 70.9
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 99.7
336% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1,346
DQ Write 1,012
DQ Mixed 1,050
820% 1,136 MB/s
Poor: 173%
This bench: 368%
Great: 433%
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GB
94GB free
Firmware: EXA73H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 775 642 628 601 597 588 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 1,035
Write 968
Mixed 897
SusWrite 638
199% 885 MB/s
4K Read 67
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 88.4
293% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,448
DQ Write 1,090
DQ Mixed 1,204
918% 1,248 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 228%
Great: 295%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
75.4% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 22.4
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 32.1
SC Mixed 18.4
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 950XDA Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 950XDA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback