Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics8.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150805
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 18 '15 at 21:36
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 61.4
2-Core 122
42% 91.5 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 227
31% 230 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 35% Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 275-$250
Device(0000 0000) 896MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4192
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
8.83% Terrible
Lighting 11.3
Reflection 9
Parallax 5.31
9% 8.54 fps
MRender 9.19
Gravity 10
Splatting 10.2
8% 9.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.83%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 491
Write 144
Mixed 247
64% 294 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 17.6
78% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 66.3
DQ Write 54.9
DQ Mixed 11.9
22% 44.3 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 76%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
96GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 41.7
Write 82.2
Mixed 52.2
44% 58.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.22
4K Mixed 0.31
77% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 60%
WD WD20EADS-00S2B0 1TB
107GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 82.7
Write 79.5
Mixed 62.8
56% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.37
108% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 61%
Seagate ST31000340NS 1TB-$95
39GB free
Firmware: SN06 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
45% Average
Read 58.5
Write 98.4
Mixed 75
58% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.51
107% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45%
Great: 60%
Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback