Lenovo 20ARS26Q06

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20ARS26Q06  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20ARS26Q06
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '22 at 20:51
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 82.6
1-Core 76
2-Core 126
59% 94.9 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 190
25% 187 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 220C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.95% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 5.7
3% 3.83 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.95%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Emtec X150 240GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 22 39 60 53 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 431
Write 91.8
Mixed 68.9
SusWrite 48.8
34% 160 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 32.5
4K Mixed 0.9
44% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 14.6
DQ Mixed 7.4
18% 41.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 88%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 1TB
62GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 69 71 70 71 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 137
Write 127
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 70.7
111% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
30% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EDJ8416E6MB-GN-F Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
49% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 16
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20ARS26Q06 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20ARS26Q06

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback