Asrock 990FX Extreme9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Extreme9  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131002
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '22 at 12:08
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 73
2-Core 140
60% 98 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 410
40% 329 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30% Poor
Lighting 38
Reflection 41.9
Parallax 38.8
31% 39.6 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 28.2
28% 35.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB-$80
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 155 114 155 106 108 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.7% Average
Read 168
Write 39.5
Mixed 173
SusWrite 136
29% 129 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 27.2
4K Mixed 22
80% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 24.6
DQ Write 64.4
DQ Mixed 35.2
30% 41.4 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 91%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 12 16 19 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 45% Great: 86%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 127 113 133 109 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 144
Write 137
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 122
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 86%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
74GB free
Firmware: 10.01E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 53 54 51 51 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
30% Poor
Read 51.7
Write 54.1
Mixed 41.1
SusWrite 52.2
37% 49.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 30%
Great: 33%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 10 12 14 16 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
74GB free
Firmware: 10.01E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 55 57 54 53 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 57.6
Write 56.6
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 54.9
39% 52.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 33%
Memorex TD Classic 003C 2GB
2GB free, PID 0008
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.2 5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
4.34% Terrible
Read 11.5
Write 4.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 5.2
8% 6.35 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.34%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.9% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 15.5
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 13.2
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FX Extreme9 Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme9 - $218

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $638
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback