PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 46.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock 990FX Extreme9 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20131002 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Feb 03 '22 at 11:09 |
Run Duration | 315 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 10% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
62.3%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB-$80
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 184 155 163 154 183 MB/s
|
46.9%
Average
|
|||
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 140 134 142 142 141 MB/s
|
84.1%
Excellent
|
|||
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
74GB free
Firmware: 10.01E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 52 55 55 54 MB/s
|
31.2%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 23 32 31 22 30 MB/s
|
||||
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
74GB free
Firmware: 10.01E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 55 58 58 57 MB/s
|
33%
Below average
|
|||
Memorex TD Classic 003C 2GB
2GB free, PID 0008
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.4 5.2 5.4 5.3 5.3 MB/s
|
4.26%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
41.4%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 48x |
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples | 27x |
FX-9370AMD $194Bench 62%, 9,054 samples | 10x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 8x |
R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples | 5x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $642 |