Mousecomputer DAIV-DGZ510

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMousecomputer DAIV-DGZ510  (all builds)
MotherboardMouseComputer Z270-S01
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170703
Uptime3 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '22 at 09:22
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 88.1
1-Core 119
2-Core 232
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 645
65% 528 Pts
64-Core 644
40% 644 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Zotac(19DA 1470) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 168
Reflection 183
Parallax 178
137% 176 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 175
Splatting 123
115% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ASU800SS-480GT-B 480GB
328GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0125H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 354 208 134 112 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 450
Write 392
Mixed 366
SusWrite 166
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 29.2
101% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 72.6
DQ Mixed 137
116% 177 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 205 208 209 208 210 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 150
Mixed 81
SusWrite 208
115% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 115%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-105.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
78.9% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 23.1
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 25.4
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DAIV-DGZ510 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

System: Mousecomputer DAIV-DGZ510

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $652
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback