Asus P8H61-M EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M EVO  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '22 at 02:10
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 196
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 480
54% 425 Pts
64-Core 477
30% 477 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Lighting 22.6
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 21.3
18% 20.8 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 17.1
18% 22 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 240GB
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0529A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 127 152 28 97 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 352
Write 321
Mixed 317
SusWrite 98.2
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 16
78% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 90.8
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 29.8
55% 105 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 162 162 164 163 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 132
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 160
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
42.7% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 13
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 13.2
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M EVO Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $224
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback