Asus H97M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H97M-E  (all builds)
Memory15.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '22 at 23:33
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 72.1
1-Core 85.3
2-Core 156
61% 104 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 313
31% 256 Pts
64-Core 324
20% 324 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Lighting 33.8
Reflection 35.7
Parallax 33.5
28% 34.3 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 34.7
Splatting 24
25% 32 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256M2P 256GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 257
Write 266
Mixed 185
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 21.9
4K Mixed 13.5
46% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 198
162% 230 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
833GB free
Firmware: HP33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 203 206 200 206 204 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 173
Mixed 87.1
SusWrite 202
120% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 114%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 1315 CT51264BD160BJ.M8F Kingston 99U5402-031.A00LF Kingston KHX1866C9D3/4GX 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.8% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 18.8
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 14.2
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 96.6
41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-E Builds (Compare 2,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-E - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $277
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback