| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Micro-Star GF63 Thin 9SCXR |
| Motherboard | MSI MS-16R4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 11 |
| BIOS Date | 20201105 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 02 '22 at 03:13 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 23% |
PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
|
62.7%
Good
|
64% 120 Pts
|
54% 429 Pts
|
32% 522 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
MSI(1462 12BD) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1165
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
33.7%
Below average
|
38% 51.6 fps
|
26% 31.2 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston MSI32D4S2S1ME-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
28.1%
Poor
|
27% 9.57 GB/s
|
25% 8.77 GB/s
|
31% 128 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical MS-16R4 Builds (Compare 2,964 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI MS-16R4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples | 920x |
| Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples | 754x |
| Core i5-9300HIntelBench 68%, 23,588 samples | 541x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples | 1,139x |
| UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples | 681x |
| GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 36%, 1,659 samples | 626x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |